Automorphic Forms on GL(2) Part II by Hervé Jacquet (auth.)

By Hervé Jacquet (auth.)

Show description

Read Online or Download Automorphic Forms on GL(2) Part II PDF

Similar science & mathematics books

Mind Tools -The Mathematics of Information

Now on hand in paperback, brain instruments connects arithmetic to the realm round us. unearths arithmetic' nice energy as a substitute language for figuring out issues and explores such thoughts as common sense as a computing device, electronic as opposed to analog procedures and verbal exchange as info transmission.

Additional resources for Automorphic Forms on GL(2) Part II

Sample text

17). Finally there is no harm in replacing the pair pair (~I ® X'n2 ® X-l) X where (~13~2) is a quasi-character of particular, by taking the order of X by the ~ . In to be large enough~ we may as- sL~ne furthermore that: L(S,~l) = L(S,~l) = L(s,~2) = L(s,~2) = I and ¢(S,~i) = q'2SU¢(0~i) where u , 0~2) = 0(~2) = u is an integer strictly larger than c,d~z and v. (of. 8). 2) will be the following lemma. measure on ~ 2 is convergent for value is ~iven by Res e ~ Rx , = e(1-s, i) be the Haar measure of dx for large enouKh.

Or P0 = 0 and are relatively P0,Q0 P0 = I . 5) follows that Then L(S,~) = Qo(q-S) -I is the unique Euler factor satisfying the conditions (11 and (2). is, similarly, a unique Euler factor conditions. L (s,~) Then there is a function of equation (31. s satisfying the two first which satisfy the functional By (11 and (2) it is a polynomial in there is a similar factor ¢(s,~,$) . There q -s and q Exchanging the roles of s ~ But and we find ~(s,~,~) ¢(l-s,~,~) Hence ¢(s,~,$) must be a monomial. 8. 5) ¢(s,~,~) = ~ (bx) (b E FX) is replaced by ~(s,~,~t)= w2(b)Ib l4(s-~) s(s,~,~) .

Which, on the left. 2). k s a is a billnear form satisfying the assumptions of Lemma So there is a function c(s) of s , defined for Res large enough, so that ks = c(S)~s Coming back to the definition of 5 s and Vs we see that~ for large enough. ~)Idet gl ~ . 2) we find that Res -19- ~(l-S,Wl,W2,#) = for Res c(s)T(s,Wi,W2,~) large enough. 3) it is enough to show that is a rational function of q-S c(s) To do that it will suffice to apply the following lemma. 5: for all One can find W i , i = 1,2 and ~ i__nn g(F 2) so that, s , T(s,WI,W2,~) = 1 .

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.51 of 5 – based on 9 votes